Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49723 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39665 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 18:44:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 18:44:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:54291] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/2C-15036-875629C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:44:09 -0400 Received: from relay19.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay19.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 182792748A5A; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay19.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 70A982748970; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:44:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C926574.8030805@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:44:04 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guilherme Blanco CC: Gustavo Lopes , Derick Rethans , "internals@lists.php.net" References: <4C873C0F.1010200@zend.com> <4C879613.7090709@zend.com> <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Again, we should not consider docblock mainly because I think > adding/removing comments of your code should NEVER modify the overall > functionality of your application. It's a circular argument - "we can't use docblocks because docblocks shouldn't be used". They are not "comments" if you don't use them as comments. > That said, docblock is no option. Now PLEASE let's stop arguing for > nothing and vote? I do not think we should stop discussing some topic just because somebody has made up his mind. Voting is fine, but "OK, I have made my mind, everybody shut up and vote" is not. > I'd recommend that since syntax is not ideal, we should not vote for > the complete patch but vote for the functionality. > > So the question to be answered is: Should PHP support Annotations? > WTF is "Annotations"? We didn't define it yet. Should PHP support Fooblahblations? Sure, I'm +1 on it, let's vote. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227