Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49706 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82329 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 15:33:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 15:33:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chadfulton@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chadfulton@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chadfulton@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.170 mail-iw0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.170] ([209.85.214.170:35084] helo=mail-iw0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/50-15036-6C8329C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:33:26 -0400 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so1357678iwn.29 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6VZybclBXqF7H3t4TIti7UuWnbNi9HiiATWkuSNCpCw=; b=YY4Ct4xk10tFIAqQELBTloEFicEapnYH3tgHqzDEwX9DTbgZKWDe6bQeh9NffmQuzu 6GbWEPRdnYSzUG2B7dvuU/MTIOhwtPJC2EVsbwXstzMWGYCLGsFkPERr4ChzIzBkBUka KmknxNYGY/KF+4idnjh7HzEkjKwyZ72ZGCMus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iTRRjxTfBBKcGL9O0I04NkwhGkpUtn0nxDNwMo384nirUdGjGzxQkjtynoJBzQuM/V uRMhTFB9yVdkvmzxEoa9yDNLntxRrfdP80GEr0qdw5GoT3t4wlWcJxy08b5B4ErgfYUb mSz47ty6tHPcX+QUNnGXcX+k/+Hj3dcuUsRLo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.31.1 with SMTP id w1mr3398569ibc.162.1284651201455; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.0.234 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1719b3800e65327659c9e9554a7514d3@localhost> References: <4C873C0F.1010200@zend.com> <4C879613.7090709@zend.com> <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> <1719b3800e65327659c9e9554a7514d3@localhost> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:33:21 -0700 Message-ID: To: Christian Kaps Cc: Guilherme Blanco , Gustavo Lopes , Derick Rethans , internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: chadfulton@gmail.com (Chad Fulton) For me, the syntax, or at least the complexity, is important. I like the idea of metadata, but what I found attractive about the docBlock parsing was that it only allowed key/value pairs of meta-data. -1 for annotations in which the engine instantiates arbitrary annotation objects. On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Christian Kaps wrote: >> >> So the question to be answered is: Should PHP support Annotations? >> >> I'm +1. >> > > +1 > > Greetings, > Christian > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >