Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49704
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=sWsDbu/77qDqnimiSvHyF2/NHBiv3FGdIFJvv0Ys1RIJlf0KvVvRrHlxVaWCYlz2U6
         ntjMHToPcs61LghphbQ10RJezfOIWEOxtOmjhS2fJ55PArKm41peE4gNW4cPV/b0syFE
         xyf3xrXUCdXJ/YyJHBjU+MJXutBDpCdxy7Ud4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <op.vi4pwzpsidpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
References: <AANLkTimuWDV=9AA63_9M6cQSp9riCPE214sUNdoV3tQn@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C873C0F.1010200@zend.com>
	<AANLkTimdCnW3ABq5QSnBa78H14e2LPBa=Kt2txU0sTD4@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C879613.7090709@zend.com>
	<AANLkTim-dHYyJxX2R3-PBVqqa3sv3+zKYr7zw7QvyngJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com>
	<4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com>
	<AANLkTikpCGj2zVNQmC1gUWaRSpsQD=qNrETi90wj_No7@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com>
	<AANLkTinuD_Aga-CbsbSq-23MTyOLPGrBEswTm=JtBY0H@mail.gmail.com>
	<4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com>
	<AANLkTinFSqCFUE3P5XvjJPwUGZqYrQR_9VHAXAWSL=rv@mail.gmail.com>
	<7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1009161454590.24012@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	<op.vi4pwzpsidpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:34:05 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwXKohy_ai1+ZWsUghkwgzcL=kT8dBi25oGcrZ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
Cc: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com (Guilherme Blanco)

Hi Derick,

Again, we should not consider docblock mainly because I think
adding/removing comments of your code should NEVER modify the overall
functionality of your application.
That said, docblock is no option. Now PLEASE let's stop arguing for
nothing and vote?
I'd recommend that since syntax is not ideal, we should not vote for
the complete patch but vote for the functionality.

So the question to be answered is: Should PHP support Annotations?

I'm +1.


Cheers,

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt> wr=
ote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:57:01 +0100, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote=
:
>
>>> There should be overwhelmingly strong reasons to add a whole new branch
>>> of syntax to PHP, I for one don't see the huge gain annotations bring o=
n top
>>> of PHPDoc.
>>
>> The only thing I can think of is added the storing of docblock data for
>> class methods and class properties. Right now I think they're not being
>> stored in the oparrays? =C2=A0In any case, I am also not for adding more
>> syntax just to do annotations.
>>
>
> Have you read my e-mail?
>
> http://news.php.net/php.internals/49674
>
> I don't understand whether you're against annotations per se or if using =
doc
> comments to implement annotations would be okay.
>
> As I said, doc comments as they are now are insufficient.
>
> --
> Gustavo Lopes
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil