Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49697 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94866 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 08:44:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 08:44:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.216.177 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.177 mail-qy0-f177.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.177] ([209.85.216.177:63877] helo=mail-qy0-f177.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 77/07-48270-2D8D19C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:44:03 -0400 Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so1087375qyk.8 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.228.146 with SMTP id je18mr2173520qcb.13.1284626640304; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:44:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.229.33.206 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:43:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <39505F13-655A-43AF-941E-77750B7F7201@gmail.com> <001601cb543a$d81ebac0$885c3040$@com> <4C8FC695.2060800@sugarcrm.com> <4C8FD72B.1070108@sugarcrm.com> <4C906333.4030204@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100915085504.17eab4d8@zend.com> <12617cf66ae07d7a2fd79a293ed69b85@beberlei.de> <4C9095D5.1050206@toolpark.com> <000001cb5511$467949f0$d36bddd0$@com> <64b4e95cac44ee297a12601d26a5453c@localhost> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:43:39 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8U2lFW4VeHq55NcI8BB5ouzTTL0 Message-ID: To: Aleksei Sapunov Cc: Christian Kaps , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 16 September 2010 16:40, Aleksei Sapunov wrote: > Hi, > Yes, you right. But [] are used in arrays definition. If take in to account > that format with @ is more readable? > > Is it a problem to implement it using @ symbol? If we're down to bickering about the finer points of the syntax, can we just have a vote already? Please? Adam