Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49696 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93564 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 08:40:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 08:40:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=saprizo@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=saprizo@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: saprizo@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.42 mail-qw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.42] ([209.85.216.42:63721] helo=mail-qw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FD/B6-48270-618D19C4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 04:40:54 -0400 Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so859108qwb.29 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:40:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=kbmtIjILwvRQGT0lhmg42U1byg5I9kvwXqD/HUy9h2w=; b=cgpo5hMGk6uy8xnh8cY2KguT0Q6TCijoB/e8pV3U8rtoA+ShtsUcaKiCflh/d9P3Fb W8LqonnfSpXBVXgGlox/t3ejSvODp806TbJifJRha2GewaKqnnh9Lshm7KUsLznOnesW UEyuSilDvHPHuTffeuXktnpt5Ck0Js8rqGaCk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=lxfpVl26acmZDQoDWry065nzeHsbXDX4HP07/891kFtBUm5FwVymcj0zzfWkiT/SKh oa7gyii3KM/Y1+ofaBnX2ZuYDysvBcrVR9JoR9U3XpNZJR8KDm+AGeex2e03qRuoG88B E08isCj5xHdyX28ufVkrYkfehnZWjcgY9I+fE= Received: by 10.229.112.21 with SMTP id u21mr1834066qcp.214.1284626446299; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:40:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.63.41 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:40:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <64b4e95cac44ee297a12601d26a5453c@localhost> References: <39505F13-655A-43AF-941E-77750B7F7201@gmail.com> <001601cb543a$d81ebac0$885c3040$@com> <4C8FC695.2060800@sugarcrm.com> <4C8FD72B.1070108@sugarcrm.com> <4C906333.4030204@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100915085504.17eab4d8@zend.com> <12617cf66ae07d7a2fd79a293ed69b85@beberlei.de> <4C9095D5.1050206@toolpark.com> <000001cb5511$467949f0$d36bddd0$@com> <64b4e95cac44ee297a12601d26a5453c@localhost> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:40:16 +0300 Message-ID: To: Christian Kaps Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235446fdf800332004905c6735 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: saprizo@gmail.com (Aleksei Sapunov) --00235446fdf800332004905c6735 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Yes, you right. But [] are used in arrays definition. If take in to account that format with @ is more readable? Is it a problem to implement it using @ symbol? 2010/9/16 Christian Kaps > Hi, > > it's reserved for the error control > operator(http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.errorcontrol.php > ). > > Greetings, > Christian > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:26:51 +0300, Aleksei Sapunov > wrote: > > Hello all, > > Only today see that here is very intersting discussion. > > I have a question: why was choosed exactly this format (seems like > c#-like, > > not java-like)? > > Simply [] is used for arrays. Why not use @ at annotation name? > > > > 2010/9/16 Pierre Joye > > > >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Arvids Godjuks > >> wrote: > >> > >> > P.S. Personally I would take the energy boiling in this thread and > >> > throw it at solving the windows biuld and PECL problem. Right now you > >> > can't install PHP 5.2 and apache on a Windows 7 - it just crashes > >> > totally. > >> > >> Where are the bugs report? > >> > >> > Only 5.3 works, not to mention much of the PECL libs just > >> > don't have dll's (lucky if you find one in the Google). The same goes > >> > for the PECL dll's for 5.3 - all of them, excluding the standard once, > >> > mostly are missing and can't be found at all. > >> > >> What are you talking about? Not a real question, use bugs.php.net for > >> php extensions, if something is broken or missing. > >> > >> Thanks to focus on the topic and not hi jack this thread with random > rants. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -- > >> Pierre > >> > >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > >> > > --00235446fdf800332004905c6735--