Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49686 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56652 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2010 03:10:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Sep 2010 03:10:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johncogg@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johncogg@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johncogg@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:39105] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 47/11-48270-39A819C4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:10:13 -0400 Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so554173wwb.11 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Dh0RQp9udzjATaiWx37U2D/gbknrWIzMkaSYhh5Ec3A=; b=o8eo8XtYiwIXSVdB1vWNvkeQc9TOOfC82ZC7xppOfgJWn30Deed2ZT9PDxXKnHlKif 1vvnSTEQEYfIkg6/ze1dK/RrSKeuBjJPGoue4JmpwRjPRxESYsqkulthovPZ9Xxs+Auf uTAb39MyPfzdxpRhxN+x2UdHLnhjzxfmjCKmM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=iAH9kbRxIiZt3zAqDWT4SP7j61MfiABdQNMzh315DgRM2YB/2cCbTZbO9SzGeJKV0G qM2SPgVAI4OK9uuDzokxeVCmakzAsDJCmxvv9D7BS6W6EFWFNISa09I5o8tbh1pc2gYt nmOClH6osDJe1L1KVIaWR0dZv6w8FGR+m/QmU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.7 with SMTP id y7mr2146800wbt.133.1284606609334; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Sender: johncogg@gmail.com Received: by 10.227.141.3 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:10:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C91863A.2050202@gmail.com> References: <4C91863A.2050202@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:10:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: o56flMF9gT9c-ibwH1yJssL9RMg Message-ID: To: Alec Cc: internals@lists.php.net, James Butler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: More formal feature request cycle From: john@coggeshall.org (John Coggeshall) Formality, in any of its forms, is about as far from PHP or this project as you could possibly get. John On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Alec wrote: > This could be good. A custom built site where people can vote for and > against (and maybe neutral) something and then post their reasoning. > > Open discussion could still take place on internals, but a site that would > provide a quick summary would be handy. So RFC wiki page + user registration > tied to an email (preferably the one used on internals) + voting. > > We are all PHP people, whipping something up shouldn't be too hard :D . > > On 9/15/2010 9:36 PM, James Butler wrote: >> >> This thought is brought on mainly by watching the annotations drama that >> is currently occupying internals, does anyone else agree it might be a good >> idea to have a slightly more formal procedure for requesting features and >> then recording votes pros, cons, side effects, etc. against it. It might do >> a fair bit to stop anecdotal talk of how many people actually want a >> feature, and stop the list retreading the same arguments over and over >> again. Have no idea just yet what this would look like, but an thinking >> something between launchpad and the current php wiki. >> >> -- >> James Butler >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >