Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49657 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55145 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 06:56:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 06:56:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:55865] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 67/94-33442-A1E609C4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:56:27 -0400 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53D9504F4; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:54:18 +0200 (IST) Received: from LAP-ZEEV.zend.com ([10.1.20.36]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:56:23 +0200 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20100915085504.17eab4d8@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:55:55 +0200 To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Pierre Joye , Pierrick Charron , Jonathan Bond-Caron , Nate Abele , PHP Development In-Reply-To: <4C906333.4030204@sugarcrm.com> References: <39505F13-655A-43AF-941E-77750B7F7201@gmail.com> <001601cb543a$d81ebac0$885c3040$@com> <4C8FC695.2060800@sugarcrm.com> <4C8FD72B.1070108@sugarcrm.com> <4C906333.4030204@sugarcrm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Sep 2010 06:56:23.0514 (UTC) FILETIME=[1BED73A0:01CB54A3] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 08:09 15/09/2010, Stas Malyshev wrote: >Phpdocs aren't "user documentation" only, not for a long time (I >mean the concept, not the particular application called >phpDocumentor, of course). They are being used as metadata in many >places. You could argue that's misguided but you can't ignore the >fact that's what people do. The "goals and usages" of those tags are >exactly metadata - and regardless of the annotations, I'd be happy >if Reflection recognized it finally (by integrating some kind of >phpdoc tag parser). I second that word for word. FWIW, I don't see it as misguided at all. Zeev