Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49647 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62647 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2010 18:48:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2010 18:48:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:51547] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D7/55-33442-483CF8C4 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:48:37 -0400 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so5901185wwb.11 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w6JVBZdjXhjJu1aswx6GDgIndrGqRbi9Z4BCqJu8icU=; b=pr5zgaa7TXP7tMu9OpIpAOiqEqMzXnexzofaMyVhdYH2Zhwlv+UX1/VF4stjmW2/GS SYT8P7coF4OG7W5nD+CQWiYNJPPXacZiicO56sD0HjMnGVUtN0k03nHEnyjO+76N67cI Psft2TfJ70j8l8bKZ/BnAf+JaH2en2YU+0Dk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pWR9WMcQ7TBzf2vmvoxx/EZsaiqrezPxaY+SN0rrTJzX+Uad7Li0YC+HBnNH3pOwib DaF7SddPclaFDv9VwXCEKuFz7alu0erlwhOx+IRIjWBIelFk14JgQvKlrJAjABBdsf9C GPl2L11Soa+wF49CixvYqBVTmpE2YWUOdFPm0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.198 with SMTP id w6mr291098wbu.124.1284490113347; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.131.72 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:48:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <001601cb543a$d81ebac0$885c3040$@com> References: <39505F13-655A-43AF-941E-77750B7F7201@gmail.com> <001601cb543a$d81ebac0$885c3040$@com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jonathan Bond-Caron Cc: Nate Abele , PHP Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi, On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Jonathan Bond-Caron wrote: > On Tue Sep 14 01:25 PM, Nate Abele wrote: >> >> Sorry, but I don't see how this is even remotely close to being >> appropriate for PHP. Maybe I'm missing something. :-) >> > > I agree, the use cases are just not there There are plenty of use cases for that. The main problem I see is that nobody seems to have actually used them in other languages, and then totally miss why it is a good thing (while not being deadly critical). Only the syntax is discussed is somehow disturbing too. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org