Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49642
Return-Path: <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 66171 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2010 20:51:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 13 Sep 2010 20:51:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6
Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:60977] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id A5/2E-24501-7DE8E8C4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:51:36 -0400
Received: from relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8318713D4078;
	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay9.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 52FC713D3B09;
	Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4C8E8ED4.9040502@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:51:32 -0700
Organization: SugarCRM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gustavo Lopes <glopes@nebm.ist.utl.pt>
CC: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <AANLkTimuWDV=9AA63_9M6cQSp9riCPE214sUNdoV3tQn@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimdCnW3ABq5QSnBa78H14e2LPBa=Kt2txU0sTD4@mail.gmail.com> <4C879613.7090709@zend.com> <AANLkTim-dHYyJxX2R3-PBVqqa3sv3+zKYr7zw7QvyngJ@mail.gmail.com> <4C887D2B.2000605@zend.com> <4C8AC526.7000505@sugarcrm.com> <AANLkTikpCGj2zVNQmC1gUWaRSpsQD=qNrETi90wj_No7@mail.gmail.com> <4C8B6168.30504@mohiva.com> <AANLkTinuD_Aga-CbsbSq-23MTyOLPGrBEswTm=JtBY0H@mail.gmail.com> <4C8BC81E.8000605@sugarcrm.com> <AANLkTinFSqCFUE3P5XvjJPwUGZqYrQR_9VHAXAWSL=rv@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913145703.0d226d90@zend.com> <AANLkTi=KCpgNwhq55+f9+60K=y197HTbifaAd7=9qPop@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913172559.0d2277d0@zend.com> <op.vizacsuhidpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20100913183427.0d2277d0@zend.com> <op.vizeorx8idpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net> <4C8E6B6F.4080308@sugarcrm.com> <op.vizk9rxvidpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net> <op.viznfkg1idpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
In-Reply-To: <op.viznfkg1idpuyk@cataphract-old.dulce.lo.geleia.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch
From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev)

Hi!

> If I'm not mistaken, the current implementation instantiates an object
> each time getAnnotation() is called, but it was proposed to change this
> into a lazy-loading mechanism with the same instance returned every time
> for each annotation. In that case, we'd only need to validate that one
> time.

Object instances can't be bytecode-cached, so when are they 
instantiated? Does it mean it's stateful and mutable?
-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227