Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49495 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20984 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 18:00:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 18:00:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:50522] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/C3-34028-2D8047C4 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:00:51 -0400 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so127444wwb.11 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DZXpOoOyldTfewMZhtperh8iEbFmwMQnqu3VyrObD6s=; b=ptqqPbpR7MWpSTKOhQivyRGPl8gj75vU5PMjB452oWkDf7Vo8yI5wSuLxWlh/oHp6V 4EawFU7bDV0nmF7qfJ9o72XKwMaGhTX6xM7Pd4i8TXgtxujCaMiGBXHcHzEUeMDj7V6C 4fM8jYK9WdG/wOZVvTpzyy06UUB1Hw67gUXjw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=uLUoT5iYvND3VX2CwejyjzIwHrtO9kZssPgoSJdDuEhBXw59A53BXQV/fWRSjJVHSX PFYTlbBsnGg3bDtWXR+dmsASZT4rizEyPmZixaAi1H9hkC7XZkQYRie8vkUqlp7XK7n0 9VjuK9EL72WYKnrrhhzye4gXsI9iBVE1gIPSo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.10 with SMTP id q10mr6022099wbw.92.1282672847259; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.138.225 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 11:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C7405A5.7040700@sugarcrm.com> References: <4C73F30A.8080007@sugarcrm.com> <4C7405A5.7040700@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:00:47 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Adam Harvey , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] #52563: Adding E_NONE and/or E_EVERYTHING constants From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > >> Rhetorical question: Why do we need constants when the values never >> change? :) > > You seriously don't know why one needs constants or don't see a difference > between constant E_WARNING equal to 8 and constant E_NONE meaning "nothing" > and equal to 0? How about having constants ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR? Just in > case, won't hurt anybody, right? :) Do we have to stop add constants with obvious numbers? My obvious number is 42 :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org