Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49492 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16402 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2010 17:44:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2010 17:44:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:39302] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/C2-34028-DF4047C4 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:44:29 -0400 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so107684wwb.11 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Py9BKnfbCnxZygIrf60K5AY/R6hKRSHrijoIios6p7U=; b=vV2KK2/zX0+z9W/KAoSDu8UsCYaluO5BfTDlem77wELU2aX+kjX7Iz+sxWXzrSma7E Ui0+nue1EhKz0iUSBGXxHm0Q7m2tTPi19XR0NJ13Bg3Hp4e0oy+Q2nf5hwreincbDRxV AmT8I4++R1lllAg+0uecbTHjftzy0Xac+AC8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TlwbjbvVpvU/6P3y+HdIbbLHieoOw8T19yBf9ZiezDGqSwD6E0/qhuJIJwUEs83kwW QSwkfakl1BObSZGoM3Oko4M/5AZD4yZmAbJZxXu0Va26u1iswFSb279mxH7zfJNiOiCM IouZy1aGkUvj+o9lrYp+lcYn1Q5wn9EX5mEik= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.29.91 with SMTP id p27mr474811wbc.67.1282671866159; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.138.225 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:44:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C73F30A.8080007@sugarcrm.com> References: <4C73F30A.8080007@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:44:26 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Adam Harvey , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [PATCH] #52563: Adding E_NONE and/or E_EVERYTHING constants From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> http://bugs.php.net/52563 suggests adding an E_NONE constant (set to 0) to >> go with the various other E_* constants we have. I've hacked up a quick > > I'm kind of confused - why we need E_NONE? In case value of 0 should ever > change? Rhetorical question: Why do we need constants when the values never change? :) Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org