Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49469 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78780 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2010 21:00:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 Aug 2010 21:00:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chrisstocktonaz@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chrisstocktonaz@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chrisstocktonaz@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:35073] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/BA-00261-F5B9D6C4 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:00:16 -0400 Received: by eyb6 with SMTP id 6so1388385eyb.29 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:00:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NyDY+QGjMi+3+6gRZa5oBH/hWi3SW6az/nBF5m+Is9c=; b=EGrwt1yWnjR6tisQNUMTBKR9WbLr8eHsb1wfE2s5WYKo/pat1PVJLO8QgCOtdd3x/q QhDjMrqTLAgmIF3YQzYtsQf0SngtjvRZvU5K0zcEAzwLrSPaRQbbzkUwkAvvgBr/VagL jDb1ViRXlWFxkeGd/x6tySDiTUVvArytjclvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=aFhDgH02kqYfsJjPZa+RVcjQHyvgUpCiq8Hmf9Uj5Z1474p7q82SzgsKO7V9HmfuF5 6bCAybhC3IwbF6kmeNuycbed4MTGbO28aKsbpwWZUW62zqBGo9JSg08FQI3i4JRdc0OZ CDXDrDvoKumdTDRDP9BUjIOXUS+KKXmj97k98= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.157.72 with SMTP id n50mr1124995wek.4.1282251612707; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.180.201 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:00:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C6D86FF.7050503@gmail.com> References: <4C6CE273.2070501@sugarcrm.com> <4C6CE604.1010209@dmi.me.uk> <4C6CE793.1020601@sugarcrm.com> <1282206735.2561.11.camel@guybrush> <4C6CF898.5060706@gmail.com> <4C6D2EB8.30700@gmail.com> <4C6D39EA.4000705@gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100819181013.18df1df8@zend.com> <4C6D86FF.7050503@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:00:12 -0700 Message-ID: To: Nathan Rixham Cc: Zeev Suraski , "Ionut G. Stan" , internals@lists.php.net, smalyshev@sugarcrm.com, Dave Ingram Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] inheritance check too strict? From: chrisstocktonaz@gmail.com (Chris Stockton) Hello, On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Guys, this is going a bit nuts, let's swap all the Foo and Bar's for a real > example - Zeev I've copied the way you specified above. I think your misunderstanding his position. To summarize my understanding: he clearly states that in such a use case a warning is in order, however currently the warning is overly aggressive. I think in general this is a small fish in the pond but I see his point. Kind Regards, -Chris