Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49398 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44032 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 22:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 22:39:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:58936] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 59/1C-18548-F96236C4 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:39:28 -0400 Received: by wwb39 with SMTP id 39so796581wwb.11 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:39:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LaA/wXvQSKJM0M67FUMNeCyL3hoyPpDIvmZo7SszGpI=; b=NOhLjmgOI2BFkN8bHSBQnv0m21w0H4zZ3WjATYyGrUnOoqBRIsDtFtXZ3llVfANUND mG85mM45dZduse6a/r5YCzDtd75g/uf8Hx3VjcnOxTzWAf9Jmnu/VpJqawjIn2W4lV33 jgIdWWRL6AnUhF0Xda8GQYR4QEGTrkjcIY7BA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZmTIjXbVVXR5UdbfbA1O9v+OckduRCtg5JjF+KDn0tDPzCy2T808D2UIeu395Ov1BT yBsdA9kWRK4ljMfYpp2y03pfNzjJkkwuhW+plJMgOwnOE5NJKrXvZYX3tveQdayNuV7/ 71yWJCAFIEofrfYTo0/mJGeIvA7tqWpla25EQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.76 with SMTP id z12mr17289520wbt.60.1281566364827; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.138.225 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:39:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C62EC4A.9020106@sugarcrm.com> <4C6320C9.5060306@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:39:24 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] back to 5.4 alpha From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Pierre, > > With all due respect, there are plenty of things already in trunk to > make it a worth while effort to start planning the 5.4 release. Just > because you disagree, an opinion you are entitled to (like everyone > else), does not mean it is a no go, last I checked no one had veto > powers on the future release process. Right, and no one can decide alone when we have to begin a release. Please understand my point: I'm not saying we won't need to begin soon, but I do not accept the way it is done, the total lack of respect of the other core developers and the total lack of roadap, consensus or general agreement about what will be php-next. I have worked with all RMs since years as part of the release process (windows and other things like pear before). We are so bad at release management, dead lines, QA, BC between releases, etc. And what do we do to improve the situation? Absolutely nothing, however we prefer to let one person decides again what and when we have to do. Sorry, I can't and won't accept that. For the rest of this discussion, I will come back in time with proposals, obviously and as I have to. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org