Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49397 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40156 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 22:34:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 22:34:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.42 mail-pz0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.42] ([209.85.210.42:57269] helo=mail-pz0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id ED/4B-18548-955236C4 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:34:01 -0400 Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so278005pzk.29 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iooeHWz1Ae71GAe0V6Ue01I0AmM1sTYO4IOpO0Rd/ZY=; b=fsIy/5LeRIlY3WZZxySvfZTV4ZF49Y8EyXLGf/76UcUZlI2UGbtcA0rfr9OAdUGyzs N38fmCZLeKz3arxhBHqgLZ0AEiLeyP0cwvKciqIP9wrwZBMF1CEjd11ZQU090CtZ3Igt At1aqAAPrn+VWmfkgRaFeiH2l5jS2ZJ5DeK1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=sqXM+YSJl5tIQj2xZfkG3dx/RQBnAsWGf0U96QPiREj1ot/ttwpKc+OGYHJ0tQTM2W F2CxG0nJCsUbH7kFpfiMEnIEt4oYsjkKWfw6rfxmn0Mwt3gBDMHctIyJYhdPGCNOIX8z St9zrSbbyDXQ7ZhL5+Ar0gRObgjazI5JCNCRc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr22685888wac.199.1281566038517; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.132.19 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C62EC4A.9020106@sugarcrm.com> <4C6320C9.5060306@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:33:58 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RDBDrVDZvSAiAE-8yelpwqeTBes Message-ID: To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Pierre Joye , Stas Malyshev , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163645928a7b69a8048d93d848 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] back to 5.4 alpha From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs) --00163645928a7b69a8048d93d848 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Pierre, > > With all due respect, there are plenty of things already in trunk to > make it a worth while effort to start planning the 5.4 release. Just > because you disagree, an opinion you are entitled to (like everyone > else), does not mean it is a no go, last I checked no one had veto > powers on the future release process. Johannes had already outlined a > number of major features/changes in 5.4 branch that are IMHO are > definitely enough to start thinking about a new version. Waiting until > we got every feature, idea considered will take an indefinite amount > of time and unlikely to result in a release. Additionally, a really > BIG 5.4 with tons of features will take that much longer to make > stable that something with a more manageable changeset. 5.4 is not the > *last* PHP release, there will defiantly be others and those version > can encompass features that didn't make it into 5.4. > > The "strict type / type hinting" discussion aside there definitely > appears to be a consensus among the core devs that 5.4 release process > should start. > > I think you missed the point. Pierre isn't against the release, but against the current process. Tyrael --00163645928a7b69a8048d93d848--