Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49391
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.123 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4C6320C9.5060306@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:14:33 -0700
Organization: SugarCRM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
CC: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4C62EC4A.9020106@sugarcrm.com> <AANLkTikrSSS2YV7h=46KA+QMCLRAGYNPKC_6FOD0sSan@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikrSSS2YV7h=46KA+QMCLRAGYNPKC_6FOD0sSan@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] back to 5.4 alpha
From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev)

Hi!

> I think using trunk as base is a mistake. We should begin using a
> stable branch (5.3) and merge what we want for the next release. It is
> also too early to begin to think about 5.4 as there is still a couple
> of things to clarify before. The most important ones being:

Why have trunk then? 5.4 has a lot of things added to 5.3, merging them 
one-by-one to 5.3 would be just waste of time.

> - What are the top new things we like to have in
> - Define a clear release process (not going to go through a 5.3.0 or 6.0 again).
> - Define the RMs, I do want a good, honest and respectful RMs.

Go ahead, do that :)

> The last point can wait as we are a couple of months away of defining
> the first two. For example I have a couple of very important things to
> add to the stack but I won't be able to describe them fully before
> September (I'm in holidays now, remember that 5.3.3 is a couple of
> weeks old...).

It'd be alpha, you have enough time.
-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227