Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49374 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95995 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 19:50:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 19:50:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=indeyets@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=indeyets@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: indeyets@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.42 mail-pz0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.42] ([209.85.210.42:41329] helo=mail-pz0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/72-18548-EEEF26C4 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:50:07 -0400 Received: by pzk30 with SMTP id 30so219591pzk.29 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=j4nnC570SVZAEBe4OoDocty+HjIyjrZYWBQUFjX3EIg=; b=ev+tRkG8AIbeH/Ac9+dEaTf4dhtA29FUkJZezrIzxAm0vPGP974mcEot1f8oO7i2SA /OILB7EWOpa5uABH5vTbDl8dsV/z8b136wyuD7vEv+2GOOSRCaoJbrClEQAoXnwzSzbu B4iUjnNkjXy7x4jNZn/WJZmceOSmKBRkuug2w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HgdhJwLhVKhHVttKnqcsgIcjQ5WhRNNpcgBjkqtD84N6TroV6VX6Z0a+hmUz3t0P/5 sqP7bO1IKUVpkNu4+QrfdWYxDkxzAuTqs7kqJhB+DxrIqe/YxxNyJ+tECICi9XFoNwQa bbfmTNuKFAD/QIGPLtjUEqlaIdAk9FsxzsmTw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.128.12 with SMTP id a12mr16612229wfd.9.1281556202452; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.43.8 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:50:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C62FD01.7010306@lsces.co.uk> References: <4C62EC4A.9020106@sugarcrm.com> <4C62FD01.7010306@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:50:02 +0400 Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] back to 5.4 alpha From: indeyets@gmail.com (Alexey Zakhlestin) On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> >> +1, I think that's the most sensible solution for now that would allow >> us to proceed with 5.4, something we all seem to be in agreement on. > > A slight aside here, as I have not be bothering about what HAS been > implemented typing wise ... A large section of the code a work with passes a > range of data to functions and classes. If the function gets an integer it > looks up the record with that id, an array assumes the data is already > loaded, and perhaps a string value defines that a new record of that name is > to be created. So I don't want the parameters passed to be tied to a single > type. Is THAT affected by any of the current typing actions? both suggested type-hinting strategies are optional. so, you, as developer, are free to not use type-hinting and accept any data you like -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://www.milkfarmsoft.com/