Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49352 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53557 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2010 16:25:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Aug 2010 16:25:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cyberspice@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cyberspice@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.158.45.55 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cyberspice@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.158.45.55 elf.thecommune.org.uk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [85.158.45.55] ([85.158.45.55:32960] helo=elf.thecommune.org.uk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/99-01618-0FEC26C4 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:25:21 -0400 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[IPv6:::1] ident=1002) by elf.thecommune.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1OjEG9-00083z-Hy for internals@lists.php.net; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:34:33 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20100811165446.0f024fd0@zend.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:25:16 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <5BCAEE51-6445-4DD1-8D7B-F9367DFB3DDF@php.net> References: <1281478269.6608.292.camel@guybrush> <4C61D6FB.6030108@sugarcrm.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100811085214.0f024300@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100811140400.0f024ab0@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100811165446.0f024fd0@zend.com> To: Internals X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: internals@lists.php.net X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: cyberspice@php.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on elf.thecommune.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Strict typing (was: Typehints) From: cyberspice@php.net (Melanie Rhianna Lewis) On 11 Aug 2010, at 15:13, Zeev Suraski wrote: > Maybe I'm old school, but in my opinion, trunk should only contain = agreed-upon features. It should also always build and pass tests = successfully. It's not the wild-west version of PHP, it's PHP's next = version, in progress. Want to work on something experimental or = controversial? Do that in a branch, merge it if & when it gets accepted = to the language. I think that depends upon (a) consistency with how it was done last = time; and (b) what you're used to. I've worked on plenty of projects = where the trunk was bleeding edges and branches are used for release = preparation. Melanie