Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49270 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17448 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 16:50:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 16:50:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike@rile.ca; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike@rile.ca; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rile.ca from 206.248.154.183 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike@rile.ca X-Host-Fingerprint: 206.248.154.183 ironport2-out.teksavvy.com Received: from [206.248.154.183] ([206.248.154.183:3171] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AE/9A-61991-E33816C4 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:50:07 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EANsfYUxMCpVm/2dsb2JhbACUV4tdcr0ChToEkBg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.55,349,1278302400"; d="scan'208";a="72267112" Received: from 76-10-149-102.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO MikePC) ([76.10.149.102]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2010 12:50:04 -0400 To: "'Derick Rethans'" , "'Kalle Sommer Nielsen'" Cc: "'Internals'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:47:11 -0400 Message-ID: <002001cb38ab$add54770$097fd650$@ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acs4fLEvd9eV7TApTcWuG8VAx955DQALgfvg Content-Language: en-ca Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 Alpha? From: mike@rile.ca ("Mike Robinson") On Tue, Aug 10 2010, Derick Rethans wrote > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > > > With the recent additions to 5.4, aren't we getting closer to have a > > public alpha release, or just a development test as we have many > great > > additions and changes to the current trunk or atleast set up some > sort > > of roadmap for what we all like to have in 5.4, or be that 6.0 as > > thats yet another thing we should get settled soonish. > > I'd say: let's do 5.4-alpha! There's plenty of cool stuff in trunk. Absolutely. Humbly, if the "release early, release often" mantra is to be [re-]embraced, I'd say start right now. Best Regards, Mike Robinson