Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49246 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33393 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2010 09:38:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Aug 2010 09:38:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mabi@rateu.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mabi@rateu.de; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain rateu.de from 87.118.98.117 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mabi@rateu.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 87.118.98.117 earth.farbfinsternis.net Received: from [87.118.98.117] ([87.118.98.117:50079] helo=earth.farbfinsternis.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/93-14965-D1E116C4 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:38:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.26] (p4FD535F7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.53.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by earth.farbfinsternis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2C18878004 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:48:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C611E19.4060505@rateu.de> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:38:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <1281429940.969.2093.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 Alpha? From: mabi@rateu.de (Matti Bickel) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/10/2010 11:25 AM, Adam Harvey wrote: > We might end up needing > to rethink how we structure the manual by looking at something like > the Python approach of having separate manuals for separate versions, > which would require a not-insignificant amount of work. As an PHP developer: Providing manuals based on version sounds like a good idea. But I'm not sure about the amount of additional work involved and the willingness of docs contributors to do this.. > – Will downstream distributors want to ship non-LTS versions? As Gentoo downstream: yes, sure. Not so sure about Ubuntu and other binary-based distributions, as long as you don't fit into their LTS release cycle. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxhHhkACgkQfNMcoUhJ7GxubgCZAe5cjy3COOX0/y5ChpqoMaxd ZnMAnigNMR0CbKHL/Ky7EkM2EvgMioyJ =AEUz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----