Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49209 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 54543 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2010 22:32:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Aug 2010 22:32:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:46317] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EF/99-30659-61C3B5C4 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:32:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1596C580DA; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:32:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from [10.8.11.37] (unknown [74.85.23.220]) (Authenticated sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com) by smtp5.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA id C8CD758340; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 18:32:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C5B3C13.4080107@sugarcrm.com> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:32:51 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ignas Rudaitis CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Feature proposal: userland support for name qualification From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > unqualified aliases, it would be useful to extend this functionality > to string references to these classes/functions/constants as well. It would require to carry "namespace context" around with every function/class in runtime and for me the usecase is not clear. Can you describe more in detail what you try to do and why you need runtime resolution for it? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227