Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49189 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 61188 invoked from network); 30 Jul 2010 18:11:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jul 2010 18:11:06 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 128.59.13.12 unknown Received: from [128.59.13.12] ([128.59.13.12:3659] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 08/71-52896-6B5135C4 for ; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:11:03 -0400 Message-ID: <08.71.52896.6B5135C4@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:11:06 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit References: <1A7DEEA5-A4AA-40F5-A2E5-BD8AB8FD398A@ubuntu.com> Followup-To: php.internals Lines: 22 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Posted-By: 128.59.13.12 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] IMAP patches from kolab -- can we get these merged? From: geissert@php.net (Raphael Geissert) Pierre Joye wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Raphael Geissert > wrote: >> As it seems, the best and maintainable solution is to switch to some >> other alternative library (sadly, there's no such candidate atm.) > > What make you think that c-client is dead? I have seen updates last > year and I know that the main developer still works and support this > library. I don't think either that using 6 years old discussions to > decide something is a good idea. Tomas already clarified that point. > Something like that happened for php > and gd with Etch, and it was a total fiasco. I talked to Jonas about gd too, the failed collaboration attempt, etc, and I would like if we could try to make it work. However, that's a different topic and should be discussed separately. I hope we can count on you. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert