Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49162
Return-Path: <adam@adamharvey.name>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 39504 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2010 07:48:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2010 07:48:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name from 209.85.216.42 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.42 mail-qw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.42] ([209.85.216.42:54459] helo=mail-qw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 6B/43-21430-C32315C4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:48:12 -0400
Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so5425qwb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.45.147 with SMTP id e19mr5754qaf.267.1280389689723; Thu, 
	29 Jul 2010 00:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: adam@adamharvey.name
Received: by 10.229.216.8 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:47:47 +0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w6jNoy5FC3Ht4EbgKJsDck-iN1A
Message-ID: <AANLkTinjAvmAGnLxb-RNivYJScVa3xZRHJLtsXaGHOAH@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <info@tyrael.hu>
Cc: internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Mail filtering (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Return type-hint)
From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey)

On 29 July 2010 15:43, Ferenc Kovacs <info@tyrael.hu> wrote:
> ps: the spam filter rejected my previous email because of the
> codesearch links...

This happened to me repeatedly the other day, too, even with an e-mail
that ultimately didn't feature any links at all. Can someone with
admin access see if the mail filtering's working properly, please =E2=80=94=
 it
seems extremely over-zealous at the moment about rejecting e-mails
with non-spammy links.

Adam