Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:49005 php.pecl.dev:7323 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41976 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2010 03:15:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2010 03:15:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rsmaia@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rsmaia@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rsmaia@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.170 mail-qy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.216.170] ([209.85.216.170:33254] helo=mail-qy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/20-40308-9EF923C4 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:15:53 -0400 Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so1816514qyk.8 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:15:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=tCr/rpu3lmr1Du0HmPIvlpr/GMy/eisIHbeknKTn/QA=; b=QnsG47f+9Vc1MoEc97kR08K/n9yPKoqWnvXx6ge6mflPLooj99+VokloZNh+93VwMJ DyU+tRgSUrVvul1NFt3cClfhoJ9dO3X4VIDaV0NHDEC6Pjbf6OUISRIb8MC6zetkx5Bg 7TW7WcTsQ1HLJCMCOSc+12up8kZ+YpOgI0QaQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=GGgFrb/Mb2qyD8YOqfUEh/yn0d98Fzq2ejF2yF68oAetOMa8r5fA0borgGpDJxp0/V n5zqv2XrwnXi4CRWNETQbSrIUMCvD4f79EaT3c3jPy1T8LiVmdcQELMB7/qSuFbnFYqY 8yK0L4fT5K+OOmA8Bfb+IBYo/HppeL7PR+51U= Received: by 10.224.73.102 with SMTP id p38mr1979696qaj.270.1278386150138; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:15:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.248.196 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 20:15:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 00:15:30 -0300 Message-ID: To: pecl-dev@lists.php.net, internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f88cfc05d66af048aaf7808 Subject: Re: PECL Intercept still alive? From: rsmaia@gmail.com (Ricardo Maia) --00c09f88cfc05d66af048aaf7808 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Nobody willing to answer my question? 2010/6/29 Ricardo Maia > Hi guys! I didn't find another way to resolve my doubts... so, i wrote this > mail. > > I'd like know if the intercept extension will be mantained? There is some > promissor roadmap or plans to move these functions to the core or modify the > magic method __call() to intercept implemented methods? > > Thanks! > Ricardo Maia (Brazil) > --00c09f88cfc05d66af048aaf7808--