Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48916 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80394 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 11:27:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 11:27:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.124 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.124 c2bthomr06.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.124] ([213.123.20.124:29947] helo=c2bthomr06.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/5D-04713-BBC4F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:27:56 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.5] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr06.btconnect.com with ESMTP id FRH05624; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:27:49 +0100 (BST) X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0301.4C1F4CB5.003D, actions=tag Message-ID: <4C1F4CB4.3060705@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:27:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100402 Fedora/2.0.4-1.fc12 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <4C1E784C.8010300@lsces.co.uk> <4C1E7DEC.5090908@lerdorf.com> <4C1E96AD.2050100@lsces.co.uk> <4C1F038D.8040303@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr06.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0204.4C1F4CB9.024F,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > On windows it is even easier, just don't load the dll file, most > extensions other then PCRE (?) are compiled as modules anyway... APC > would be no different, and I would go as far as saying that on Win32 > Wincache is probably a better choice. As long as these are added as loadable extensions then that is not a problem. The windows builds do bundle some things RATHER than adding everything as extensions, and it is that which I am probably flagging up. So as long as I can pick and choise which extensions are shipped with a windows build I'm happy. If it IS an extension that can be left out, then it should not be enabled by default anyway? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php