Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48910 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70900 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 11:05:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 11:05:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rrichards@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rrichards@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 207.58.142.213 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rrichards@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.58.142.213 smtp2go.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.58.142.213] ([207.58.142.213:33605] helo=smtp2go.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/5B-04713-2674F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:05:06 -0400 Received: from [67.158.171.203] (helo=Rob-Richardss-MacBook-Pro.local) by smtp2go.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OQeoH-0005YL-Og for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:05:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4C1F475D.7000803@php.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:05:01 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SMTP2Go-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@smtp2go.com for more information X-SMTP2Go-MailScanner-ID: 1OQeoH-0005YL-Og X-SMTP2Go-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-SMTP2Go-MailScanner-From: rrichards@php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: rrichards@php.net (Rob Richards) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > I for one think it is a really good idea, there is no compelling > reason not to include APC, I would even go as far as say we should > enable it by default. > > +1 > +1 for including APC -1 for enabling by default It was already agreed to include it into 6 before so why the need for another vote on this just because its a new trunk? Rob