Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48909 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 68949 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 10:55:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 10:55:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org from 209.85.212.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:37808] helo=mail-vw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 82/FA-04713-E254F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:55:42 -0400 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so1385033vws.29 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:55:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.123.9 with SMTP id n9mr2042131vcr.129.1277117738433; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:55:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.70.202 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:55:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C1F038D.8040303@lsces.co.uk> References: <4C1E784C.8010300@lsces.co.uk> <4C1E7DEC.5090908@lerdorf.com> <4C1E96AD.2050100@lsces.co.uk> <4C1F038D.8040303@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:55:37 -0400 Message-ID: To: Lester Caine Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) On windows it is even easier, just don't load the dll file, most extensions other then PCRE (?) are compiled as modules anyway... APC would be no different, and I would go as far as saying that on Win32 Wincache is probably a better choice. On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> >> The test was done on Windows... I never said it was IIS only, it is >> however >> win32 only. > > Sorry - Most people using it will no have bought win64 yet was the point and > the > test was done on win32 as far as I can tell. Anyway Pierre keeps saying that > 64 bit is slower anyway ;) > >> All extensions can be disabled by the user compiling the code... > > On Linux that is fine, but on Windows? We keep having this debate on what is > compiled into windows builds and what is optional and that is the point > here. Although the increase in third party sites providing more flexible > windows builds is probably the way ahead. > > -- > Lester Caine - G8HFL > ----------------------------- > Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact > L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk > EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ > Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// > Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >