Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48906 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57889 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 10:02:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 10:02:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:34014] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9A/E8-04713-CA83F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:02:21 -0400 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so2009403fxm.29 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:02:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g/on0OEcJCA7X00HPWk6Yz1W/shTKhSGpc4CEjrrBqs=; b=wT10k/a+WukUkNK7LkY7RF+Sh4noGgifLZe5DHB6z3ApD7K+eWw+b6eIBlYXvFKb/b /KeQy9B9eu0i7dVMD84KIw5g5oCMju0KTk36abbWVKMjYM1JHPxl6+6Gw3mos0q+yIK+ 9lRpXKyJZjxZjd41p5X5KjOl5LXazv+XMWw74= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JtxxwNpnj3a9SEjLjgvYFPM2RO5lZGm4eOgxCMWaG/aktIsOSbZsQaaWiyUv/U2Jju cMBUX0H8XDs477uI5kr5rbg6q7FXLuxHagOu/MJ032XG+pAbZlW6jcLgFiXtJ90LNBtS lEbFgs1oaE7jG6HuZ/GaGvVse1VXfvviuB15I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.21.23 with SMTP id h23mr4701105fab.21.1277114538080; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.143 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:02:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9B.98.04713.E173F1C4@pb1.pair.com> References: <1736FE65-C0F0-4677-919D-410C81C0FD47@macvicar.net> <4C1EF360.3060902@lerdorf.com> <5E.F5.04713.BD92F1C4@pb1.pair.com> <50.57.04713.B513F1C4@pb1.pair.com> <9B.98.04713.E173F1C4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:02:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: jvlad Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:55 AM, jvlad wrote: >>> keep on the topic pls, which is the inclusion of potentially buggy and >>> poorly maintained APC. >> >> I'm on topic. You seem to be able to fix this bug very easily, I only >> told you how to provide patches. > > I do not care of bugs in APC unless this module is NOT in php core. > If they appear in php core, I'll decide whether php is a right way for me to > go at all. This bug is not APC specific. >> APC is well maintained but all I can read from you are some random >> bashing about non APC specific bugs. > > Know what? APC is wrongly designed as a php extension which does not allow > it to catch certain things at certain time, so it is definitely bug in APC. Certain thing at certain time? Ok. > License argument does not work at all. It does, more than ever. But I think we have now got the idea, you don't like APC. Point made (or at least said). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org