Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48904 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51534 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 09:35:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 09:35:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:59805] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F5/B7-04713-1723F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 05:35:46 -0400 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so1990262fxm.29 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:35:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7SXK29qleZ1V2oeb84tLj/iwUc+t2NgQ88y4f7yReKw=; b=rjdynMI/d08K8dTIbEQt2v0n9fM9qt2kG6aGzjYEYBAJWsCEjazZZE7ss1vgtAh0LD JRYttKZroyuBVobXdEAevfalSIC1zu2dfHi+RW0BET0pZFrBwDOY7P1mFG2whPFfMOVm uMfboRMV7438upwLmeTyYiyOZfB1OBv5L4/2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=B0pNhDEpkUU2ZC3KKZJEXcesVVVzb7ah+nQtXETnpq5MUj9uEABnaKrjJWL7mnDHOu 0foa//Hm3zYuTzg4aRdc5avX6zJ8CamSIo6lVQNhCfRmlhGS03tTsXSY/XVl+GCnYvQe pu+IKoggZJ8/zG6rJIRsq1mi5xHW8v6exdrh8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.92.153 with SMTP id r25mr4622699fam.76.1277112941671; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.143 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:35:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50.57.04713.B513F1C4@pb1.pair.com> References: <1736FE65-C0F0-4677-919D-410C81C0FD47@macvicar.net> <4C1EF360.3060902@lerdorf.com> <5E.F5.04713.BD92F1C4@pb1.pair.com> <50.57.04713.B513F1C4@pb1.pair.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:35:41 +0200 Message-ID: To: jvlad Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:31 AM, jvlad wrote: > keep on the topic pls, which is the inclusion of potentially buggy and > poorly maintained APC. I'm on topic. You seem to be able to fix this bug very easily, I only told you how to provide patches. APC is well maintained but all I can read from you are some random bashing about non APC specific bugs. APC is the only opcode cache available at php.net and under a very permissive license (aka PHP's). You may like other options more than APC but that's definitively not arguments against APC. If you have specific issues with APC or specific cases to show how APC is poorly maintained, then please raise them. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org