Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48900 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42703 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 08:59:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 08:59:12 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 95.31.13.88 xdmitri2.static.corbina.ru Received: from [95.31.13.88] ([95.31.13.88:9935] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/F5-04713-BD92F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:59:10 -0400 Message-ID: <5E.F5.04713.BD92F1C4@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net References: <1736FE65-C0F0-4677-919D-410C81C0FD47@macvicar.net> <4C1EF360.3060902@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:58:59 +0400 Lines: 34 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-Posted-By: 95.31.13.88 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: dmda@yandex.ru ("jvlad") "Rasmus Lerdorf" wrote in message news:4C1ED90D.2030707@lerdorf.com... > On 6/20/10 7:44 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> Can you elaborate? What "average user"-facing features are non-obvious? >>> We should document them if nothing else. >> >> This recently caught my attention: >> http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16745 >> As I understood from this bug, APC changes how PHP works (since it works >>.... > > By the way, including APC in the core is actually likely to fix this > problem because it has to do with the order the rshutdown functions are > called. Read Christian's excellent description of the problem here: > > http://news.php.net/php.internals/46999 > > -Rasmus concerting http://news.php.net/php.internals/46999 If APC is that well-maintained as many people impressed here, why this rather simple bug is still not fixed during the year? Why the other php opcode caches do NOT impose similar problems? Isn't it yet another reason not to add APC into the core? Doesn't it plainly show that there is no benefits from the fact that people behind APC are known? -jv