Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48889 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9405 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2010 06:15:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Jun 2010 06:15:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.120 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.120 c2bthomr02.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.120] ([213.123.20.120:19589] helo=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 7D/A0-04713-0930F1C4 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:15:45 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.5] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr02.btconnect.com with ESMTP id MJD17465; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:15:41 +0100 (BST) X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0301.4C1F038D.00C0, actions=tag Message-ID: <4C1F038D.8040303@lsces.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:15:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100402 Fedora/2.0.4-1.fc12 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <4C1E784C.8010300@lsces.co.uk> <4C1E7DEC.5090908@lerdorf.com> <4C1E96AD.2050100@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0207.4C1F038E.0012,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > The test was done on Windows... I never said it was IIS only, it is however > win32 only. Sorry - Most people using it will no have bought win64 yet was the point and the test was done on win32 as far as I can tell. Anyway Pierre keeps saying that 64 bit is slower anyway ;) > All extensions can be disabled by the user compiling the code... On Linux that is fine, but on Windows? We keep having this debate on what is compiled into windows builds and what is optional and that is the point here. Although the increase in third party sites providing more flexible windows builds is probably the way ahead. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php