Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48869 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 48292 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2010 23:38:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2010 23:38:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:45261] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/A5-15307-566AE1C4 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:38:14 -0400 Received: from relay15.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay15.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 16C9430B0167; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:38:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay15.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id D37F830B0125; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:38:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C1EA662.1010601@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:38:10 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I for one think it is a really good idea, there is no compelling > reason not to include APC, I would even go as far as say we should > enable it by default. I do not think it is a very good idea. APC has certain effects on the code that are far from obvious, and enabling it by default would significantly complicate the average user's learning curve. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227