Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48868 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43346 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2010 22:31:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2010 22:31:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.128 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.128 c2bthomr10.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.128] ([213.123.20.128:26573] helo=c2bthomr10.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 20/15-15307-1B69E1C4 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 18:31:14 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.5] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr10.btconnect.com with ESMTP id FRE83718; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:31:10 +0100 (BST) X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0301.4C1E96AD.017C, actions=tag Message-ID: <4C1E96AD.2050100@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:31:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100402 Fedora/2.0.4-1.fc12 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <4C1E784C.8010300@lsces.co.uk> <4C1E7DEC.5090908@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr10.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.4C1E96AE.00FD,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Sure, but that's win32 only Does that matter at present? http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2010/02/09/wincache-apache-and-a-pretty-graph/ My only objection to bundling yet another package into the core distribution is that it should be removable as well. eaccelerator works for me so I see no reason to change from it any time soon, and the performance figures I've been seeing support that position .... like MySQL .... probably as many people don't use it as do, so lets keep the core to what is needed, rather than what is optionally replaceable? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php