Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48854 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18596 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2010 20:21:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jun 2010 20:21:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 213.123.20.120 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.123.20.120 c2bthomr02.btconnect.com Received: from [213.123.20.120] ([213.123.20.120:25712] helo=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B4/70-15307-0587E1C4 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 16:21:37 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.5] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr02.btconnect.com with ESMTP id MJB74909; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:21:32 +0100 (BST) X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=0001.0A0B0302.4C1E784C.00C8, actions=tag Message-ID: <4C1E784C.8010300@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 21:21:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100402 Fedora/2.0.4-1.fc12 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.4C1E784D.0210,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2009-07-20 21:54:04, dmn=5.7.1/2009-08-27, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] APC in trunk From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) ( Foregot to change address again :( ) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > What are your views on including APC in the core, or reasons not to? Dictatorship? Optional module which have well used alternatives should not be proced on by default! Probably more people use alternatives and have for years? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php