Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48725 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52017 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 15:20:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 Jun 2010 15:20:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=brian@moonspot.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=brian@moonspot.net; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain moonspot.net designates 72.5.90.27 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: brian@moonspot.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.5.90.27 smtp.dealnews.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [72.5.90.27] ([72.5.90.27:32919] helo=smtp.dealnews.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 98/56-17116-7D2011C4 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:20:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 6516 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 15:20:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.dealnews.com) (10.1.10.7) by -H with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 10 Jun 2010 15:20:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 4223 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2010 15:20:52 -0000 Received: from h105.248.18.98.static.ip.windstream.net (HELO macdough.local) (brianm@98.18.248.105) by -H with ESMTPA; 10 Jun 2010 15:20:52 -0000 Message-ID: <4C1102D4.6080105@moonspot.net> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:20:52 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasmus Lerdorf CC: internals References: <4C10FD00.1050204@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: <4C10FD00.1050204@lerdorf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Gearman support for php-fpm? From: brian@moonspot.net (Brian Moon) The big difference is that different processes do different jobs in Gearman. All PHP workers in fpm just run what ever code is handed to them. How do you handle that? Brian. -------- http://brian.moonspot.net/ On 6/10/10 9:56 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Has anybody thought about adding Gearman support to the fpm sapi? > Managing Gearman workers is pretty much identical to managing fastcgi > workers, so it doesn't seem like much of a stretch. > > -Rasmus >