Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48592 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22290 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2010 17:41:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2010 17:41:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.203 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.203 smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.203] ([67.192.241.203:34141] helo=smtp203.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 66/30-20625-136450C4 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:41:07 -0400 Received: from relay20.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay20.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6DEB5212851F for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay20.relay.dfw.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3F3422128112 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C05462E.2090204@sugarcrm.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:41:02 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4BD87B5C.4020902@no-surprises.co.uk> <1275326628.24497.1.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ereg deprecation? From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I also won't recommend using ereg, I just thought the unique reason to > deprecate it was the unicode stuff, hence wouldn't make sense to keep it > deprecated... But as there are others motivations, I prefer leave as is too. I think we have enough reasons to keep it deprecated as we have much better alternative (pcre) which we want to recommend to the users. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227