Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48584
Return-Path: <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95616 invoked from network); 31 May 2010 17:25:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2010 17:25:33 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:60913] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E7/B0-26688-B01F30C4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:25:32 -0400
Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so1399458wya.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=FMdP+WceUg4dxBf/DyteCytkz/8jGFtsi5A6/o+hrCg=;
        b=tNw6gar+YCSAHWUGCTr+YIpASiY3AjiDS2GlS82gxyQfG6MFJKmycjrrfKSkcRCmha
         ukk9Mc03aPCl44EMvDdm7yJQ+xVtJzL2zcRIJ4K/nhymGYdX2w+ke0qn1t0lqnZCzsXO
         QmULO3h5WrD3YVWlcboFQ6rNudrzSaUL4G56c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=a+xV75JJQpB6AaytOV8J8fmixo/khdtCFiHqVylUt6X8tWP3Q/LBKrrTz2gGQJWD/i
         ISFea1AGZhT5hQq/eHqbeZQ/1MqZHOkl6RXSj3MZXjqKhivO8G3wFNCaoTGOnAVE+qO+
         10sQKQUryHnqnVYCXnEbRACyRi+vsELixNmDU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.136.147 with SMTP id r19mr4625938wbt.218.1275326728725; 
	Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.221.34 with HTTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilL7TLXHzUWcQIBUC6PzOD5HnudAmV4HQu_RNG8@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4BD87B5C.4020902@no-surprises.co.uk>
	<AANLkTilL7TLXHzUWcQIBUC6PzOD5HnudAmV4HQu_RNG8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 19:25:28 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinxwEwygb9bUfzj-oAZb_lTuvT-JGyJOmpCahoT@mail.gmail.com>
To: Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Maclean <michael@no-surprises.co.uk>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ereg deprecation?
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

hi,

I don't think we should remove it. The sooner users stop to use ereg,
the better.

Cheers,
--
Pierre

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/4/28 Michael Maclean <michael@no-surprises.co.uk>
>
>> Hi,
>> I think I asked this before on IRC, but I've forgotten the answer. I was
>> just remembering that the ereg extension was due to be deprecated in PHP6 -
>> does this still apply to trunk?
>>
>>
> I think make no sense to keep it deprecated.
>
> Here's a patch for undeprecate ext/ereg in 5_3 and trunk:
> http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/undeprecate-ereg.diff
>
> Any objection? If no, I'll commit it in soon.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Felipe Pena
>



-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org