Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48581 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92310 invoked from network); 31 May 2010 17:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2010 17:21:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=markskilbeck@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=markskilbeck@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: markskilbeck@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:59267] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A0/00-26688-FFFE30C4 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:21:05 -0400 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so1396277wya.29 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:20:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=syb2dRCMx7+aNQUPLaS8BW7Vm9k0Hcj7RCrflOGN3PU=; b=BS91zG/hq/MA3jH/Ps/7j3p43zqQvIBfWLzJ/EVM11OhrNFIl4Jw0PCK4tyjPb6II5 Bj47zJK0meqyQLIgkYskEY6ZktRa0NZdAe2fLQwBesGwAlVT35mCqRYlcfLglbbmPJ+m ViPalFfYtLiJ65+XHUi9Ssy26hgZOlNX9LObI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VtP5IUPMCtu3YSB+3eEI3CxCmPza4ZMithfM+Mgx241ruH3XR6H2qck6hi52GIuFrS AqYosQlxlLE4vBEsQdgSaFDW8pO0cFUUxoKqEEWsfBcwjUtQ9t26pc7IMMtKY5zV6VLb yA1ZB8I7r8upiGmFRqkZBxIgERoAHRkYDDUPE= Received: by 10.227.146.207 with SMTP id i15mr4604896wbv.214.1275326445012; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (host86-136-163-178.range86-136.btcentralplus.com [86.136.163.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h22sm36588466wbh.15.2010.05.31.10.20.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 31 May 2010 10:20:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C03EFEA.6030901@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 18:20:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Pena CC: Michael Maclean , PHP internals References: <4BD87B5C.4020902@no-surprises.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ereg deprecation? From: markskilbeck@googlemail.com (Mark Skilbeck) On 31/05/10 18:09, Felipe Pena wrote: > Hi, > > 2010/4/28 Michael Maclean > >> Hi, >> I think I asked this before on IRC, but I've forgotten the answer. I was >> just remembering that the ereg extension was due to be deprecated in PHP6 - >> does this still apply to trunk? >> >> > I think make no sense to keep it deprecated. > > Here's a patch for undeprecate ext/ereg in 5_3 and trunk: > http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/undeprecate-ereg.diff > > Any objection? If no, I'll commit it in soon. > Why does it make no sense? It was clearly deprecated for a reason. -- Mark Skilbeck mahcuz.com | gtk.php.net | pecl.php.net/cairo | docs.php.net