Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48580 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89910 invoked from network); 31 May 2010 17:09:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2010 17:09:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felipensp@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felipensp@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.161.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felipensp@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.161.42 mail-fx0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.161.42] ([209.85.161.42:63078] helo=mail-fx0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 09/C2-07860-63DE30C4 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 13:09:10 -0400 Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so3150820fxm.29 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:09:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A+cx3/qT3iG7KQGuAqOg4x6T3XdNQBRx3+9GbI4e1FY=; b=Dvw3dksq1GF4y1IEPfgpopI2nwhryghofHiOG829FyX9RRPC7P0SXKrEzcwLg0qans jzyJFLiaGOK5g7Achz8FlVN3eWzKzfTMX5ABY49x4S76mW+wqT/VPOKkTQb+4msqQJQN Abozuj2/wrqTekOBhFwRf182C2EfQLHlvs0cI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BOZbjWXCxhAJqeuNUC7vhS9scG35neHBtfc6dsGJfxHrkL49RkoeRNABlG+zimRy+o 9gDVHoOT5fmVmCviNHHtt3m/fM8gDZMRSUSQ37ZvN8cr6Vg4B7ZmmPbAMWau+vuVjZ8j GmM3XIwthIAAmfemQHuJE0Dd6Tto1CEjLhAEY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.207.1 with SMTP id e1mr2069332mug.122.1275325746149; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.160.17 with HTTP; Mon, 31 May 2010 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD87B5C.4020902@no-surprises.co.uk> References: <4BD87B5C.4020902@no-surprises.co.uk> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:09:05 -0300 Message-ID: To: Michael Maclean Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364c79cf1279f60487e6eaa8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ereg deprecation? From: felipensp@gmail.com (Felipe Pena) --0016364c79cf1279f60487e6eaa8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, 2010/4/28 Michael Maclean > Hi, > I think I asked this before on IRC, but I've forgotten the answer. I was > just remembering that the ereg extension was due to be deprecated in PHP6 - > does this still apply to trunk? > > I think make no sense to keep it deprecated. Here's a patch for undeprecate ext/ereg in 5_3 and trunk: http://felipe.ath.cx/diff/undeprecate-ereg.diff Any objection? If no, I'll commit it in soon. -- Regards, Felipe Pena --0016364c79cf1279f60487e6eaa8--