Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48456
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=PriVRCtINnGYSzHGwiyUDLDr+rOc2LTbZaczsP0wT8Sp8YPikoYzxnwSWl7CYMewTO
         ZalRaKFY9lhAFfDbuFaiSzC+kBL96O374XXIOFamK2wZrOputa/5bB4yoRe7Jecaz7AI
         p7qbJAS4qramwkt4hVf+AXYtJQ7TLu5Axj6mM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4BFAE5B3.9020009@oracle.com>
References: <4BF24049.90408@zend.com> <4BF571F7.2000400@oracle.com>
	 <4BF62595.8090403@zend.com> <4BFAB4CF.4070202@oracle.com>
	 <4BFABF91.6080004@zend.com> <4BFAE5B3.9020009@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 23:42:17 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinJmWXGoBf_eOTtdAVqdS6IVo2e9Gpq_XYtrgd0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Run Time Cache RFC
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Christopher Jones
<christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Dmitry - that's great.

I second that, useful info for people with time issues like us :)

> Also thanks to Stas for his reply.
>
> Chris
>
> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> I've added notes for extension maintainers.
>> I hope they will answer all your questions.
>>
>> Thanks. Dmitry.
>>
>> Christopher Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>>> =A0>> =A0> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/runtimecache
>>> =A0>> =A0>
>>> =A0>> =A0> The patch breaks binary and source compatibility but it's no=
t hard
>>> to
>>> =A0>> =A0> adopt extensions to use it.
>>>
>>> =A0>>
>>> =A0>> Hi Dmitry,
>>> =A0>>
>>> =A0>> Can update the RFC to explain the breakage and
>>> =A0>
>>> =A0> It's clear from the patch. The same is explained in RFC in human
>>> =A0> language, but it's not so exact :)
>>>
>>> The RFC should give enough explanation so (i) extension maintainers
>>> can immediately identify if their extension is going to be affected
>>> (ii) readers know where to look in the patch to get more details.
>>>
>>> If I understand what you implied later in your email, calls to
>>> zend_hash_copy should be replaced with calls to
>>> object_properties_init. =A0Is this always true? =A0Is this the only
>>> extension requirement? =A0What happens if extensions don't do this -
>>> will it break or be a performance loss?
>>>
>>> I must be looking at a different RFC because there's nothing I can see
>>> that mentions any of these things.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>
> --
> Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com
> Tel: =A0+1 650 506 8630
> Blog: =A0http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/
> Free PHP Book: http://tinyurl.com/ugpomhome
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org