Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48441
Return-Path: <dmitry@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 41831 invoked from network); 24 May 2010 18:04:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 24 May 2010 18:04:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com  
Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:35643] helo=il-mr1.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 2B/94-13219-69FBAFB4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 24 May 2010 14:04:07 -0400
Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21])
	by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF999504B2;
	Mon, 24 May 2010 20:41:03 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from ws.home ([10.1.10.6]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Mon, 24 May 2010 21:04:02 +0300
Message-ID: <4BFABF91.6080004@zend.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:04:01 +0400
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>
CC: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4BF24049.90408@zend.com> <4BF571F7.2000400@oracle.com> <4BF62595.8090403@zend.com> <4BFAB4CF.4070202@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BFAB4CF.4070202@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2010 18:04:02.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[7DF8A4C0:01CAFB6B]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Run Time Cache RFC
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

Hi Chris,

I've added notes for extension maintainers.
I hope they will answer all your questions.

Thanks. Dmitry.

Christopher Jones wrote:
> 
> 
> Dmitry Stogov wrote:
>  >>  > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/runtimecache
>  >>  >
>  >>  > The patch breaks binary and source compatibility but it's not 
> hard to
>  >>  > adopt extensions to use it.
> 
>  >>
>  >> Hi Dmitry,
>  >>
>  >> Can update the RFC to explain the breakage and
>  >
>  > It's clear from the patch. The same is explained in RFC in human
>  > language, but it's not so exact :)
> 
> The RFC should give enough explanation so (i) extension maintainers
> can immediately identify if their extension is going to be affected
> (ii) readers know where to look in the patch to get more details.
> 
> If I understand what you implied later in your email, calls to
> zend_hash_copy should be replaced with calls to
> object_properties_init.  Is this always true?  Is this the only
> extension requirement?  What happens if extensions don't do this -
> will it break or be a performance loss?
> 
> I must be looking at a different RFC because there's nothing I can see
> that mentions any of these things.
> 
> Chris
>