Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48390 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19762 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 15:56:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2010 15:56:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:57444] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 01/B9-46027-ABEF7FB4 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 11:56:44 -0400 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444B2504FC; Sat, 22 May 2010 18:33:46 +0300 (IDT) Received: from LAP-ZEEV.zend.com ([10.1.20.36]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 22 May 2010 18:56:38 +0300 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20100522185503.0a601890@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 18:56:37 +0300 To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Pierre Joye ,Philip Olson , PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: <548A854F-C5CC-4C7D-A42D-788EACA238DA@roshambo.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100522175529.0a6019d8@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100522180909.0a601b20@zend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2010 15:56:38.0429 (UTC) FILETIME=[5CCDF4D0:01CAF9C7] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] trunk guidelines (was Re: [PHP-DEV] scalar type hinting?) From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 18:49 22/05/2010, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >Zeev, > >There was a comprehensive discussion on this functionality a few >months back on the mailing list and the overall consensus was that >the functionality made sense (as was committed) but was to late in >the game to be part of the 5.3 branch. So, now that the trunk has >been established it went in. Ilia, There was discussion about it, where I as well as many others expressed objections to the proposed solution - there clearly wasn't consensus. I mentioned numerous times that we need to discuss it again before moving ahead to implement. Zeev