Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:48386 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9738 invoked from network); 22 May 2010 15:10:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 May 2010 15:10:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:39830] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 56/B7-46027-AF3F7FB4 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 11:10:52 -0400 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.21]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678045055A; Sat, 22 May 2010 17:47:54 +0300 (IDT) Received: from LAP-ZEEV.zend.com ([10.1.20.36]) by il-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 22 May 2010 18:10:46 +0300 Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20100522180909.0a601b20@zend.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 18:10:45 +0300 To: Pierre Joye Cc: Philip Olson , PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: <548A854F-C5CC-4C7D-A42D-788EACA238DA@roshambo.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100522175529.0a6019d8@zend.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2010 15:10:46.0352 (UTC) FILETIME=[F4705500:01CAF9C0] Subject: trunk guidelines (was Re: [PHP-DEV] scalar type hinting?) From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) Maybe I view trunk in a different way than others, but I think committing it turns it into some sort of 'status quo', and now we'd need a good reason to change it. I think major developments should be discussed on internals (IRC's fine, but not enough), and should be discussed before committing to trunk. Zeev At 18:04 22/05/2010, Pierre Joye wrote: >hi Zeev, > >It seems that there was a bit of discussions on IRC about committing >Ilia's implementation. However it is trunk, and trunk is a development >tree. That means its purpose is to develop new PHP features. But it >does not meant that these features will make it in the next releases >or if they will remain as they are now. > >Cheers, > >On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > Not sure what happened here, but scalar type hinting was still up for > > discussion as there are two conflicting RFCs. > > > > Not sure how come a version of it was committed to trunk, so it should > > definitely not be documented at this time. > > > > Zeev > > > > At 17:51 22/05/2010, Philip Olson wrote: > > > >> The documentation team is about to document a few trunk features, but > >> we're unsure about scalar type hinting. I see no final proposal > (only three > >> old RFC's) nor recent discussion here. Is the recent scalar type hinting > >> commit meant to bring discussion to the topic? Or, has this form of scalar > >> type hinting been finalized somewhere? Please advise. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Philip > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > >-- >Pierre > >@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org