Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47951 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 13129 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 07:39:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 07:39:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.219 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.219 mail-bw0-f219.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.219] ([209.85.218.219:47009] helo=mail-bw0-f219.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 84/A3-20494-8A2C6CB4 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:39:20 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so11264bwz.1 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:39:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VRIhqL9p8irgWOLuVmhqQeKmN1SX5TrWG9TZUBiMyK0=; b=VcT9aHkT4Vt5+/egazf6ZAv02veJXMZINA7g9D8cZ9Ls9WrvJuL2tcBYtJUqelanys 0+9A/4Vu1YnD3oo04P9g6tHKilPscxCkaTus09P9hyX4C8r4B8tA6PzrwNGxKI/l8q70 pdQkwY7bypCMCImQ2Mc15Q6oSQ/fpvdJU5MN4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nei3vNUpMTxcJqamLPKG/TqgiCk5Av+B7JBbmRlDT3j8bZ/8kia125UPZyBKE8V3XP 7PGSfqcaJCJbPNkcvxxqHuPedfVaQpthUwBINIb1JYwaF/zmIssfHlwxC8+Xt3n7sJqi Wum5lVrBu3rAHgjCYQ1/dYcOUbMfJt8gMVxgY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.20 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:39:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BC58D10.4050609@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:39:15 +0200 Received: by 10.204.141.27 with SMTP id k27mr9952711bku.26.1271317155909; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgTG95ZXQ=?= Cc: =?UTF-8?B?5ruV6Lev6YGl?= , Rasmus Lerdorf , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd5e4799122048441979e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] One suggestion to PHP-FPM From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --0015175cd5e4799122048441979e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:25 AM, J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Loyet = wrote: > 2010/4/15 Ferenc Kovacs : > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote= : > >> > >> > >> 2010/4/15 J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Loyet > >>> > >>> 2010/4/15 =E6=BB=95=E8=B7=AF=E9=81=A5 : > >>> > We check error log after our server crashed, and we found that php > heap > >>> > memory is out of limit, > >>> > so I think imagick use emalloc to allocate php heap memory, to chec= k > >>> > the > >>> > zend_memory_usage is > >>> > not a method for imagick, other circumstances which occupy huge > memory > >>> > can > >>> > use this method to > >>> > ensure the system have enough free memory. > >>> > >>> OK, > >>> > >>> one thing I didn't understand is "why should you want check de zend > >>> memory usage when there is a memory_limit parameter in PHP.ini " ? > >>> does'nt it do the same at PHP layer when allocating ? > >>> > >> > >> Obviously you didn't read the original mail, and the links inside: > >> > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/highload-php-en/browse_thread/thread/1882a= 3b2257dcc5c/ea73892cea011541?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dgaochunhui#ea73892cea011541 > >> > >> The problem here is that PHP wouldn't free any allocated memory untill > >> the process exits, so there's the risk of memory exhaustion if too > >> many PHP processes were running, even though each process wouldn't > >> exceed PHP's memory_limit. > >> > >> My suggestion is more about releasing the allocated memory as soon as > >> possible. That is, this option is similar to "max_requests". > >> > >> PHP-FPM would kill the PHP process if the requests a process handled > >> exceed max_requests, and similarly, PHP-FPM should kill the PHP > >> process whose memory usage exceeds "exit_on_memory_exceeds". > >> > >> So one of your lib (for example imagick) leaks memory, on the long run= , > it > >> will exhaust the memory limit, and will kill a totaly request. > >> You can set that how many request should be served with one worker, bu= t > >> you can't soft limit it's memory consumption. > >> This is what the patch does: > >> if you set the hard limit: (memory_limit) you can guarante that no > process > >> will use more memory, because if it tries, it will fail. > >> and you can set soft limit, if that reached, the process will die and > >> respawn after finishing the current request. > >> > >> Tyrael > > > > Btw: did you know about > > http://php.net/manual/en/function.apache-child-terminate.php I just > noticed > > a few days ago, obviously, you can't use with cgi/fastcgi/php-fpm but f= or > > apache, it does exactly what you need, except that you have to execute > from > > userland. > > This function is interesting but it's called from php scripts. When > you are a sysadmin who host hundreds of different customers, you can't > garanty each customer will call this function each time he uses > consomption scripts. > Yeah, I know, and I think I did mention that, but this sounds like a good feature in the language, but sadly it has too many limitation in it's current form. (no windows support, only works with apache) Tyrael --0015175cd5e4799122048441979e--