Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47947 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7083 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 07:14:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 07:14:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.219 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.219 mail-bw0-f219.google.com Received: from [209.85.218.219] ([209.85.218.219:57433] helo=mail-bw0-f219.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F5/62-20494-BCCB6CB4 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:14:19 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so167885bwz.1 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=96IRQGhblNvOi68I/J/629IWBFeS//eh030H4X3vgKE=; b=lgG2BSSUTUYGx3L2OP2JEZhEoHd5LWmB3zzPqIYWdt06tzEyknLwlzeablxY3wYCs3 ADP1v7LkM0nyetwC2UyP4o/hJWJJaS8U9cCg8taNMAbxIbvJPgmRM3ETuaHb+FMJT0HB +FHoxxhAeCQYl2qq3p9hp3eA3Y/sFsJcp1DbI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hdQQOCX+FFiPENLMmCmV9mYuCaObW9Fjhs32vsJm4u4t74NguOkXOgZ76KhUZ4Pho8 M9zxo3CDtbml25r8kecM/YO3QhQSCFDm7IvJv7XDWctw1/G5hnnAFL85nBfLgfpSN+8d CEnwMJ1TJacf83QlVAhqJ/DhP/2UaU0dfyTLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.123.20 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BC58D10.4050609@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:14:16 +0200 Received: by 10.204.141.27 with SMTP id k27mr9912871bku.26.1271315656126; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgTG95ZXQ=?= Cc: =?UTF-8?B?5ruV6Lev6YGl?= , Rasmus Lerdorf , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd5e414b18d0484413e29 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] One suggestion to PHP-FPM From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --0015175cd5e414b18d0484413e29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > > 2010/4/15 J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me Loyet > > 2010/4/15 =E6=BB=95=E8=B7=AF=E9=81=A5 : >> > We check error log after our server crashed, and we found that php hea= p >> > memory is out of limit, >> > so I think imagick use emalloc to allocate php heap memory, to check t= he >> > zend_memory_usage is >> > not a method for imagick, other circumstances which occupy huge memory >> can >> > use this method to >> > ensure the system have enough free memory. >> >> OK, >> >> one thing I didn't understand is "why should you want check de zend >> memory usage when there is a memory_limit parameter in PHP.ini " ? >> does'nt it do the same at PHP layer when allocating ? >> >> > Obviously you didn't read the original mail, and the links inside: > > > http://groups.google.com/group/highload-php-en/browse_thread/thread/1882a= 3b2257dcc5c/ea73892cea011541?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dgaochunhui#ea73892cea011541 > > The problem here is that PHP wouldn't free any allocated memory untill > the process exits, so there's the risk of memory exhaustion if too > many PHP processes were running, even though each process wouldn't > exceed PHP's memory_limit. > > My suggestion is more about releasing the allocated memory as soon as > possible. That is, this option is similar to "max_requests". > PHP-FPM would kill the PHP process if the requests a process handled > exceed max_requests, and similarly, PHP-FPM should kill the PHP > process whose memory usage exceeds "exit_on_memory_exceeds". > > So one of your lib (for example imagick) leaks memory, on the long run, i= t > will exhaust the memory limit, and will kill a totaly request. > You can set that how many request should be served with one worker, but y= ou > can't soft limit it's memory consumption. > This is what the patch does: > if you set the hard limit: (memory_limit) you can guarante that no proces= s > will use more memory, because if it tries, it will fail. > and you can set soft limit, if that reached, the process will die and > respawn after finishing the current request. > > Tyrael > Btw: did you know about http://php.net/manual/en/function.apache-child-terminate.php I just noticed a few days ago, obviously, you can't use with cgi/fastcgi/php-fpm but for apache, it does exactly what you need, except that you have to execute from userland. So I think it would be a good idea, to generally implement a soft/hard limi= t for memory allocation: if soft fails, the process terminates after the request, if the hard limit fails, it is terminated instantly. Tyrael --0015175cd5e414b18d0484413e29--