Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47885 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41776 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 09:17:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 09:17:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@stefan-marr.de; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@stefan-marr.de; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain stefan-marr.de from 85.88.12.247 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@stefan-marr.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.88.12.247 toolslave.net Received: from [85.88.12.247] ([85.88.12.247:58365] helo=uhweb12247.united-hoster.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D1/E4-11452-615E2CB4 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:17:11 -0400 Received: from soft83.vub.ac.be ([134.184.43.183]) by uhweb12247.united-hoster.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O1Fkz-00054J-8Y; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:16:40 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <03128BF8-9EAC-4BAC-AAFE-6D8AA21153DC@pooteeweet.org> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:16:57 +0200 Cc: Derick Rethans , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <4DA7D942-6BF1-4A0F-AECF-3EB82900798D@stefan-marr.de> References: <03128BF8-9EAC-4BAC-AAFE-6D8AA21153DC@pooteeweet.org> To: Lukas Kahwe Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Traits From: php@stefan-marr.de (Stefan Marr) On 12 Apr 2010, at 10:39, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > On 12.04.2010, at 10:34, Derick Rethans wrote: >> Hi! >>=20 >> Just had a look over the RFC, and from what I gathered was that only = the=20 >> issue of aliasing/renaming seems slightly controversional. Would it = be=20 >> possible to commit traits without this feature for now? > Stefan recently got karma and told me he can commit his traits patch = after the 15th. > I do not really think we should leave out the aliasing, lets have as = many people as possible play with it as is. We can always = tweak/change/drop it later. Right, I am hunting an important deadline at the moment, so was going to = split up the changes afterwards in step-wise patches, to make things = easier digestible. But just as a quick response, without aliasing, there would be no way to = use a conflicting method from a trait. On first sight, that is not a really good thing. Best regards Stefan=