Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47840 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52896 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 23:03:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 23:03:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:37853] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AA/72-54833-DA06EBB4 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:03:10 -0400 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (unknown [192.168.16.5]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD216504FF for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 01:42:34 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [192.168.16.93] ([192.168.16.93]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:03:03 -0700 Message-ID: <4BBE60A6.2040000@zend.com> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:03:02 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2010 23:03:03.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4BE5840:01CAD76F] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Removal of deprecated features From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > asp_tags > - Proposed to be removed aswell, Tony had a patch for this[5]. IIRC last time we discussed it there was no solid reason found to do it and some reasons not to. Could you remind why would it be useful to do it? > Class named constructors > - A feature thats been marked in the manual as something that would > be removed in a future version of PHP6. It was not to be knowing ever > decided to be kept or not, but now with the recent removal of them in > namespaces then I don't see a big point in keeping them. I don't feel good with removing these for non-NS classes... BC break would be big, though it would be relatively easy to write a script to fix that. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com