Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47762 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98540 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 01:17:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 01:17:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.185 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.25.124.185] ([212.25.124.185:59001] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 20/B7-57677-D3796BB4 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:17:51 -0500 Received: from us-gw1.zend.com (unknown [192.168.16.5]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A619D504FA; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 03:57:33 +0300 (IDT) Received: from [192.168.16.93] ([192.168.16.93]) by us-gw1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:17:44 -0700 Message-ID: <4BB69738.5000108@zend.com> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:17:44 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Ralph Schindler , internals References: <4BB4EC2F.1020502@smashlabs.com> <4BB4F16B.7020402@zend.com> <4BB4F50D.9090006@zend.com> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE03FA7FC1@us-ex1.zend.net> In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE03FA7FC1@us-ex1.zend.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2010 01:17:44.0074 (UTC) FILETIME=[767036A0:01CAD2CB] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] On constructors: BC Break and Class compiler Improvements From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! So, I think we've got consensus about not having class-named ctors in namespaced classes in trunk, and unless I hear some screams I'll commit the patch early next week. What about the 5.3? (BTW, I don't see any difference between 5.3.0 and anything later, could anybody point it to me?) We could: 1. Kill the class-named ctors for NS in 5.3 (some BC break, though I have hard time believing anybody used it so far, but who knows) 2. Kill the warning and just ignore the other one if __ctor is there. 3. Leave everything as-is. I kind of favor (1) but want to hear from people here and esp. RMs :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com