Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47758 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90749 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2010 00:35:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Apr 2010 00:35:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 74.125.83.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:56968] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FD/26-57677-86D86BB4 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:35:53 -0500 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1687758gwb.29 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.72.11 with SMTP id z11mr7006708ank.51.1270254949038; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.200.22] (c-98-234-184-167.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.184.167]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm2603674ywf.35.2010.04.02.17.35.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB68D61.2070301@lerdorf.com> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:35:45 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10pre) Gecko/20100330 Shredder/3.0.5pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GM CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <745C5243-EB51-4D43-B036-8A34CDBBB547@gregory.net> In-Reply-To: <745C5243-EB51-4D43-B036-8A34CDBBB547@gregory.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Named Parameters From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 04/02/2010 02:17 PM, GM wrote: > What do you guys think? I really want PHP 6 to rock and have an even > better reputation among businesses, programmers, etc. I really doubt named parameters would have much of an impact on anything, but I'd be willing to consider it if a clean implementation was to show up. -Rasmus