Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47624 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87447 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 22:00:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 22:00:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike503@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike503@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike503@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.223.178 mail-iw0-f178.google.com Received: from [209.85.223.178] ([209.85.223.178:52072] helo=mail-iw0-f178.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F3/2F-11385-FECDBAB4 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:00:16 -0500 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so3382564iwn.16 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TyUWIBltDQ4IDxTae/R9U+/YdSXPjiM/c90tZLpSNOQ=; b=dpFKgqqsX++wd5xznrOmNuU0+eHDn41J8a+baOLywIvf9/B3XX0yACz6XtXgAErxkK nuGfyz+5/m9ZwigGbZZMTi4fdz6ZSq62JpD3PpP9yVXxtMUbjHi3pdBNGdRLfJX598TU qMMOV8yYs41yazg0NXSpWcnq03ulsHP3RWDSg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=H8PHiLMADvocHSz2ijE4i4kUisu7ImOXgFSaSYsNJIHw8cwqtSIsnvIhUYUBGDbbtb GU8o/xTgUMila4CvA3WP3L+oDvWyOAc17ZfLCidyHmmewC0O+4OIT8AJIeNE61Q6Ern9 b1VIx5pjK5/FubD/PjPCtJqVFdqGfJg+dtWQw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.85.205 with SMTP id p13mr502158ibl.8.1269554411376; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <99cf22521003251453k4a9a5d4n5b7522f0c677d037@mail.gmail.com> References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100323230046.12e71d80@zend.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com> <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20100324102437.0b491a68@zend.com> <4BA9D167.30006@daylessday.org> <99cf22521003240334y6fb76fbcs4347429f3be48d49@mail.gmail.com> <3bea96c41003250709jd391239te35ab88b46e4803e@mail.gmail.com> <99cf22521003251453k4a9a5d4n5b7522f0c677d037@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:00:11 -0700 Message-ID: To: dreamcat four Cc: php-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC From: mike503@gmail.com (Michael Shadle) 2010/3/25 dreamcat four : > If you intend to implement this Jerome, then perhaps (any time when / > after you implement), just make new (seperate) RFC for that (just the > ini). Which (obviously) can be attached as single dependancy of this > RFC. That way, those comments / feedback can come directed back for > just you (on your chosen, preferred ini implementation). And we don't > get confused over the other ini examples. I agree this does look decent and supports includes (/me is happy) One thing - can the main fpm.conf be defined in php.ini? Instead of at compile time?