Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:47620
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=D6XuPF2lu4qnZcj+gUdKk/MfIRS/Iljx2CBiiWyhhhY5Tl9z6aKaZs1gAgsfwDQkHY
         u8suN6WYMhCwezYkFENxzKaG0Dya79lTGYDp+HBWz5zSF0hvdwsxC7jPdPxwEd53h48G
         ZgS+dQPzTJ7n/54wVB6XSbfdvJCkozPQJuReY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4BABBDD1.9050306@daylessday.org>
References: <4BA8EF6F.8010503@daylessday.org>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003232155350.4153@kossu.derickrethans.nl>
	 <7.0.1.0.2.20100324000837.13ff3080@zend.com>
	 <4BA9CB98.6080102@daylessday.org>
	 <7.0.1.0.2.20100324102437.0b491a68@zend.com>
	 <4BA9D167.30006@daylessday.org>
	 <99cf22521003240334y6fb76fbcs4347429f3be48d49@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3bea96c41003250709jd391239te35ab88b46e4803e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <bd9320b31003251130g59217bcejec5abe0125ccdab9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4BABBDD1.9050306@daylessday.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:43:29 -0700
Message-ID: <bd9320b31003251343j2fa75a82i59405d0ed7e7c685@mail.gmail.com>
To: Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org>
Cc: php-dev <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] FPM RFC
From: mike503@gmail.com (Michael Shadle)

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Antony Dovgal <tony@daylessday.org> wrote:

> You can as well stop declaring (!?) what FPM should and what it shoud not
> and start doing something useful instead.
> Writing some code might be a good start for you.

As someone Andrei somewhat entrusted to try to keep the dream of FPM
alive, I'll

Also, I am an avid user and spokesperson for FPM. I don't write C, and
I wouldn't attempt to write C for something as important as a daemon
that supports heavily loaded websites (furthermore, why would you want
me to start there) - I contribute any way I can, which has included [a
little] money [and offers of more, but nobody has accepted], time, and
support. I've offered different build environments (if we had any need
for automated testing) I have a lot of resources available, just not
coding.

I'll ignore your elitist comment. RFCs should be open for anyone, as
should discussions, and I am not "declaring" what it should do any
more than anyone else with any ideas. If you want a "coders only"
thing maybe this open source project should be taken behind closed
doors and only those people who have proven themselves worthy of
commenting on anything (who cares about the users? they're only the
majority of the open source world) can be allowed to participate.

Also I don't remember "declaring" anything. My comments about includes
are the same kind of thing -anyone- can interject. I guess I just
don't have enough "karma" to be valued in your world. I have done
nothing but be appreciative and respectful of you, and always take
your opinion as more informed as mine.